The panel comprised three representatives of regulatory bodies. First up, Julie Brannan, Director of Education and Training. Her slide points out which of LETR recommendations the SRA accepted: She also pointed out the themes that were recognised by the SRA and the evidence drawn upon. She also outlined the SRA response, its view of regulation,…
The Legal Education and Training Review submitted its findings five years ago now – seems more like 15 years to be honest, so much has happened in the interim. To mark the occasion, Jessica Guth of Leeds Law School at Leeds Beckett University has organised the above conference, taking place tomorrow. LETR’s co-authors Julian Webb,…
I’ve summarised my keynote in a blog post on the Osgoode Professional Development blog, so no need to comment on it here, except to say that the place of the arts in legal education design is a long-neglected area of educational research – more of that at the end of this blog post. This was…
Next up, Julian talking about technological life, ‘onlaw’, future shock and towards an ‘onlaw’ curriculum. He started by talking about technology – what is it? He quoted Schon on technology extending human capability. Julian focused on ICT – information & comms technology, and how these are at the centre of a major social shift to…
I’m speaking at CUHK Faculty of Law’s conference on teaching and learning in law – slides on Slideshare, and at the Slides tab above, titled ‘An exhibition of future law schools: three portraits and a seascape’. Am now attending the parallel session on Future of Legal Education. First up, Geraint Howells, ‘Every pint bottle should…
I gave a paper at Osgoode Professional Development (OPD) yesterday, on ‘Multimedia learning: 2002-18: A case study across a century of digital learning’ – slides beneath the Slides tab above. Our focus in the workshop was the design of a set of multimedia resources in 2002/4 at the Glasgow Graduate School of Law (GGSL), and…
I’m at Osgoode for the next couple of months, and yesterday attended the Legal Innovation & Education Workshop organised by the Winkler Institute for Dispute Resolution, Thomson Reuters (TR) and Osgoode Hall Law School‘s Office for Experiential Education, and held in TR’s downtown offices. This is a mix of liveblog & later comment on the…
Carrie Menkel-Meadow needs no introduction. She’s looking at six claims that things change legal education and lawyering. Her slides are dense with information, so will do what I can to summarise the myths and their details. Myth 1: legal education = think like a lawyer. What about doctrine in CL and civil jurisdictions. Method is…
This session is entitled Technology: disrupting legal education? First, Lyria Bennett Moses, from UNSW on ‘The need for lawyers’. I came in late (tea break…), but Lyria is talking about the use in admin law of data for machine learning and expert systems delivery of judicial roles and decisions. Lyria teaches expert systems: key message…
I’m in Sydney for the conference on legal research at UNSW, and kindly invited by Alex Steel to give a keynote at it. Title, not short on polysyllables – Prometheus, Sisyphus and Themis: three rival futures for legal education research. Slides at the usual places, at Slideshare and at the Slides tab above. I’ll be…
Am at a legal innovation roundtable sponsored by Thomson Reuters, in TR’s building, Bay St, downtown Toronto, at the invitation of Monica Goyal, an innovator and practitioner in Toronto who works with Osgoode and is the founder of Aluvion. Brian Inkster is the guest speaker, introduced by Mitch Kowalski, a chapter in whose book The Great…
Last year Michele Pistone and Michael Horn published an excellent piece on law schools and disruption that’s full of interesting thinking about law school futures. It was published in the Clayton Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation, and follows in the mainstream of Christensen’s thinking on disruption. I agree with almost all of it. I’m also aware…